|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
beatles
Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 2
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:15 am Post subject: neolithic grain mill at stonehenge |
    |
|
hi, i am new here.
i am the author of a new theory of the ancient use of stonehenge based on architectural engineering. please visit our website at, http://www.granaryatstonehenge.org
there you can see several videos of our working model of the wind-powered grain mill at stonehenge as it would have looked 3,000 years ago.
please post your responses both good and bad, and i will answer each one.
thank you,
clyde |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Richard Haut
millennium club
Joined: 18 Apr 2004
Posts: 1128
Location: Nice, France
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Clyde
your website is intriguing, but it makes a number of assumptions which I would question.
firstly, the nature of the "mill" itself. What you describe is I believe known as a gristmill for grinding corn into flour. Such mills use millstones (plural) - one on top of the other. They do not use timber over stone - would it manage to grind at all ?
secondly the purpose of the power of the mill is to turn the stones. Are there any examples before about the first Century BC of such technology ? Early technology of this type was, I believe, watermills - with wind-power coming much later and certainly not using the more advanced sail technology (was this thought of even a Millenium later ?)
you are using a post-industrial revolution eye in observing an ancient structure.
sorry, but I just do not see how your view of the stonehenge-mill could have functioned, or why it would have been needed in such a unique and bizarre form. OK, I disagree with your conclusions, but it is a very enjoyable website.
_________________
Richard Haut has worked with the architectural profession for over 25 years and produces the weekly Richard Haut's Competitions, which has given architects details of many thousands of projects for which they can apply across Britain and Europe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ed Ziomek
Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 481
Location: Stamford, Connecticut
|
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 10:35 am Post subject: Interesting theory, and modern applications... |
|
|
Beatles, count me of Rich's side of doubting the use of Stonehenge for a grinding mill of any sorts.
If anything, the Stonehenge architecture was used to pinpoint the planting and harvesting times of the surrounding wheat fields. It was also used in funeral services, fertility services, royal crowning and birthing services, as probably best explained by the book Uriel's Machine, by Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, 2000.
What the locals of Stonehenge know, is that the well-known tourist location is only one of 50 or so astronomical locations in the surrounding area.
Stonehenge was an agricultural complex, arranged I believe with an astronomical theology of sorts, with similar structures all over the world.
Grinding grain was just one spoke on the wheel of a good harvest, as provided by the Gods. I cannot name any other "grinding facility" of this large size, anywhere in the world, in any period of history. Please prove me wrong on this, but I can't name one example.
Having said all that, your animated grinding wheel is a superb example of what should be installed on the ocean floors near coastal areas, in heavy water current areas, for turbine engines to produce electric energy. It is a perfect model for a modern applications.
Very interesting example. Thank you.
_________________
Ed Ziomek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ed Ziomek
Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 481
Location: Stamford, Connecticut
|
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 9:21 pm Post subject: Using Google Earth and Photoshop, once again.... |
|
|
Clyde/Beatles...
In further research of the surrounding countryside of Stonehenge, I have come across another King profile of sorts. I caution everyone that these faint images seem to be layered among several competing other layers, other graphics, other geoglyphs, indicating many phases, many different cultural influences of the 8000 year old Stonehenge story.
First image, Stonehenge "sun circle" in the 7 o'clock position, with highway A344 running diagonal left to right, and converging with A303 in the 5:30 poisition.
At the convergence of highways A344 and A303 is the "King 1" profile explained earlier. Note: both King profiles are looking West, the "sunset of life", death.
Using color enhancers in Photoshop, I compared the "sun circle" with the top oblong shadow "King 2" and the bottom right "King 1". At least 20 minor altars and lesser sub-surface "sun circles" can be observed under closer scrutiny within this image.
Finally, the top dead center of this image is an oblong shaped shadow, which I am now calling "King 2" with helmet and pivoted chin guard (faintly highlighted in white points). The presence of metal pinions which allow the chin guard of the helmet to swivel seem to indicate a more modern King, I am guessing in the 400 BC to 400 AD range. Next to it is the same image, cropped as best I can, with the facial image tilted 24 degrees clockwise. The traditional Stonehenge "sun circle" is in the 6 o'clock position.
Between the image of the oblong shadow "King 2", and the "King 1" image to the bottom right, there seems to be a third figure, but his image is even less clear.
So to the many functions of Stonehenge, I think I confirm some form of "funerary tomb for Royal Kings".
I will be sending this information to the BBC and to Sheffield University, who are studying these ruins very successfully.
_________________
Ed Ziomek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anthony Johnson
Joined: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Garry Denke
Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Plano, Texas, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
blogger
del.icio.us
digg
slashdot
