|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Funkboat
Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2004 9:24 am Post subject: Placing an image with a clipping path |
    |
|
Hi, I'm new here, and was wondering if it is possible to place an image with a clipping path into an existing powercadd drawing. I've gone and enhanced some renderings in photoshop and wanted to bring them into my drawing.
thanks for the help
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rob C
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 Posts: 531 Location: Southern Connecticut
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Funkboat
Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 1:40 pm Post subject: Re: Clipping Paths |
    |
|
Thanks for the response, however, I know that Powercadd is unable to bring photoshop files in. The problem is that any transparencies built into the file are converted into a white background, which unfortunately obscure all layers below the image. I was curious if there was a way to bring an image with a predefined clipping path, similar to what i am able to do with most layout programs, so that the image brought in appears already "cut out"
As far as colour profiles are concerned, I'm not to concerned about photoshops ICC colour profiles as the file is to be output on our plotter in the office, so that level of colour correction isn't really needed. - If any one has a solution to this problem, it would be much appreciated.
I've since learned that this can sort of be achieved by bringing in an image and then using the convert to bitmap option, but this just eliminates the white in the image and is quite coarse.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Matt
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 350 Location: Sterling, Virginia
|
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 1:48 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
| if you scale the image up considerably before converting to a bitmap, you can resize the course -- but large -- bitmap back down and it will give you the results you want. the bitmap conversion results in 72dpi stuff, so if you want 600 dpi stuff you have to enlarge it by 600/72 before converting and then reduce it by 72/600.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnMorse
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 Posts: 291 Location: Birmingham, AL
|
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 3:33 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
| In other words. "No, not really. But maybe there should be."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|