|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
designedexplosion
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 12
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:32 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
This DJ is doing to himself indeed, digging himself deeper, by re.sor.ting to personal u.nfo.unded at.tac.ks. (And who is encouraging this).
The same un-scr.upulous s.ci.en.tist.s, and other supposed leaders do when they are challenged and when their ideas are proven to be wrong.
Rather then answer and demonstrate why their the.ori.es are correct, they resort to pe.rs.onal at.tacks of ch.ar.acter (and this encouraged by the leaders even here in this case), the famous character d.ef.amation as a technique to circumvent the issues. It is never successful as it is quite predictable indeed, as can be seen in this case.
Notice also how the r.ules quickly change when they need to be adapted so that they allow you to p.er.sec.ute those who have viewpoints which do not agree with yours. Once the rules are b.ent and s.ke.wed, you can then justify your per.se.cution of such ideas and members. This str.ategy is obvious as well. So that in effect, when the entire subject of the pe.rsec.ution is u.tte.rly demonstrated to have failed the new s.ke.wed terms, the int.er.vention and cessa.tion of their rights can be thus justified. This is nothing more then applyi.ng pr.ej.udice against particular views and prohibiting views other then what you accept to be posed by others in your environment. These tactics are a.bu.sive as well. This only makes those who wish to demonstrate their point even more resilient and able to see through the h.y.po.cr.isy, thus undermining what they are attempting to do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
djswan
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 888
Location: Montana, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Naw, I'm doing this for fun and to learn something. 
Your probally getting paid by those lying religous perverts at the discovery institute.
I bet they weren't figuring on a mere carpenter to throw a wrench into thier lying religious perverted propaganda.
You're a dumbass 
_________________
n/a |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
designedexplosion
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| djswan wrote: | N.aw, I'm d.oing th.is for fu.n and to learn so.met.hing. :D
Your pr.ob.ally ge.tt.ing pa.id by tho.se ly.ing reli.go.us pe.rverts. at the dis.co.very ins.titu.te.
I b.et th.ey wer.en't figu.ring on a m.ere ca.rpenter to thro.w a wr.ench into thi.er lyi.ng re.igio.us per.ve.rted pr.opa.ga.nda.
You're a du.m.bass :P |
I am not getting paid one dime from anyone for anything I post. You can claim this is a lie if you wish.
It was a mere carpenter, by the way, that opened our mind to the cosmos.
And now another carpenter believes he can close it up.
And now back on track to the railway of information:
The B.i.g B.l.u.ff
The d.eficie.ncies of the t.h.eo.ry
After all, from the a.nal.ytical presentations of the previous info posted on the B.i.g B.a.n.g, one can begin to see the o.ri.g.in of this u.ni.ve.rs.e is beyond the competency of material s.c.ie.n.ce. Observing and testing the different energies and their interactions gives limited understanding of the phenomena. The creation of this material u.niv.er.se belongs to those incidents that cannot be observed, analyzed, or be verified by e.xperiment.
Conclusively, the p.hysi.cists, c.osmo.logists, the ast.roph.ysicists (and the members of other s.ci.en.c.es) are forced to rely on their own a.ss.um.pt.ions and s.pe.cu.la.tio.ns. (As seen in the t.opic on "a.stro.phy.sics and s.tu.ff lik.e th.at...")...Of course, there are some valid ob.serva.tions about our u.nive.rse. However, it is very bold to make far-reaching conclusions regarding the o.ri.gin of the u.ni.ver.se. Through speculative logical steps, the c.osmo.logists, who study the origin and the development of the u.ni.ve.rse, are trying to give an exp.lana.tion how the u.niv.erse e.vol.ved from its initial point up to its present state of existence. Actually, what they are certain that they know well is only their present partial picture of the universe.
For example, the e.xp.and.ing n.at.ure of the u.niv.erse is based on their o.bse.rva.tion of R.ed S.hifts, or the r.efle.ction of l.ight arriving from pl.anets and g.alax.ies. However, this expansion is not necessarily explainable only by the movements of different objects and does not prove at all that the w.orld orig.inated from an ignorant explosion.
In historical times, the t.he.ori.es about the o.rigi.n of the u.nive.rse changed many times. These include the present t.he.o.ries, which are being modified all the time.. Thus, we cannot be sure that the present understanding is correct at all. Moreover, it is right to believe that after some years and decades there will be some completely different t.heo.ry. Therefore, why should we accept the present theory?
According to the observed l.aw.s of the p.h.ys.ics, by passing of time, the existing systems became more and more dis.org.anized, except if locally, there would be a proper amount of directed energy-input that could stop and reverse the dis.orga.nization. According to the B.i.g... B.a.n.g ...th.e.ory the o.rde.r is increasing during the time without any directed e..ne..rgy. How this could be possible?
Despite that, the B.i.g... B.a.n.g ...t.h.eo.r.ie.s are not proven, yet there are attempts to prove them as a na.tu.ral.istic.... s.ci.e.n.tific.... fact, through sci.e.nt.ifi.c... propaganda.
The B.i.g.... B.a.n.g... t.h.eo.r.y... does not give an answer to the question: where did the preconditions for c.r.ea.ti.on of the universe originate from? What was/is the source of the incredible huge amount of e.ne.rgy within the u.niv.er.se?
A c.o.s.m.ic... e.x.pl.o.s.i.o.n ....would produce an equally s.pr.ea.d.ing..... en.e.r.gy in all directions creating only one h.omo.gen.eous g.as-ball.
The t.h.e..ory does not give any answer on the cause of o.r.der, complexity and the l.a.ws we can observe within the m.at.erial... un.iv.er.se. ...How could one explosion c.re.a.te ...o.r.de.r ...and not a.... c.h.a.os.? ...How is it possible to justify that one undirected e.xp.lo.sion could result in an unusually expected opposite effect, or in other words, an increase in information, o.rd.er and such useful structures like stars and planets?
The cons..equ..ences of the t..he..ory
In light of the above enumerated deficiencies we should not call the t.he.o.ry the "B.i.g... B..a.n.g ...theory" but rather the "B.i.g.... B.l.u.ff.... theory'. The t.h.eo.ry is so deep rooted in the society that many millions of people who are interested in the c.re.at.io.n of the u.niv.e.r.se believe that it is a scientifically proven theory.
Due to the so-called a.utho.rity of s.ci.en.ce, many people became a.th.eis.tic, accepting the assertion that the origin of the u.niv.ers.e is explainable without the need of a hi.g.her... i.nte.llig.ence or G.o.d..... Moreover, the strengthening of such an a.th.eis.tic idea further results in a quick decline of hu.man m.oral.ity. ...The B.i.g.... B.a.n.g... t.h.e.o.r.y ...and its proponents, and with a great probability that they don't speak the tr.u.th,... become the p.re.ac.hers of a.th..ei.sm, causing a great e.th.ic.al ...damage to humanity.
The B.i.g...B.a.n.g.... theory is an open denial of the e.xist.ence of G.o.d, and an opportunity to leave out and reject H.i.s... l.a.ws. ...Of course, there are some people who try to ha.rmon.ize their f.ai.t.h ...with this t.he.o.ry; however, globally people are turning away from G.o.d.. and living a g.o.d.le..s.s... li.f.e.
How do we explain that fact in spite of the enumerated heavy deficiencies the B.i.g... B.a.n.g... theory established in the way of thinking in our so.ciety? According to the opinion here, it is because it is one of the ideo.logic.al means to maintain the he.do.nis.tic, consumer driven society not interested in G.o.d..... Thus, it is in no one's interest to question this theory.
(As can be seen by people coming into this thread and their tactics of de.fam.ation). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djswan
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 888
Location: Montana, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Your other guise said the same thing, and he was full of shit too.
_________________
n/a |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
designedexplosion
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Maybe we have multiple personalities, maybe there is more then one of us, maybe we are to smart for you, maybe we can outwit you, maybe we are global conscience, maybe we don't exist, maybe nobody exists, we are a fiction of our imagination, maybe this thread only exists because there is somebody to observe it and ramp up it's click rate, (and rate of appearance and dis-appearance into some other dimension)....maybe this is one big experiment, maybe we are one big experience of the g.ods, maybe life is one big experience, maybe all coming here to debate are doing one big experience, maybe all opposing here are one and the same person, maybe those who are accusing the scientists advocates are all the same person and mind, or work as a single mind. Maybe maybe maybe. The universe is really to complex for us to understand now isn't it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djswan
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 888
Location: Montana, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understand you are full of shit.
_________________
n/a |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djswan
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 888
Location: Montana, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| designedexplosion wrote: | | we have multiple personalities, there is more then one of us, we are to smart for you, we can outwit you, we are global conscience, |
Yepper, real sicko perverts. 
You got some real issues to deal with dumbass.
Momma said knock you out 
_________________
n/a |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
designedexplosion
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Applying the e.v.o.lution.ry scrambler quoted previously, we have:
"I understand you are full of s.hit.
I nunasdretd ouy ear lulf fo thsi.
I neddratuns you rae full of isth.
I drdtannuse uyo aer ufll fo htis.
I ruenstndda you rea lufl of sthi.
Translation:
I N.eanderthal you wreak leftovers of s.hit.
I nedantdusr yuo are ulfl fo s.hit.
Translation:
I N.eanderthal you are awful to s.hit.
I nrdnautdse uoy era lufl of shti.
Translation:
I N.eanderthal of an era lofty of s.hit.
Hey N.eanderthal man is e.vol.ving and will become a man!
He has reached a corresponding era of maturity! The era full of s.t!
Oh, wait a minute, N.eanderthal was more advanced then modern man.
I guess we need to re-write our science books. Maybe they had more s.t back then, the we do now. Or maybe we have reached the ultimate development of s.t thinking. Maybe we have gone from an e.t to an s.t era. Many thanks again to modern s.c.i.e.n.c.e to this equation of s.t post e.t.
:) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djswan
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 888
Location: Montana, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oops, I was getting a bit tired there and spelt dumbass wrong.
Is there any point to trying to help these sicko religious perverted dumbasses out??? or are they to far gone to help?
I have seen these attacks by religious wack jobs on other forums.
I just made myself laugh by putting religious wack job and designedexplosion together.
Derek
_________________
n/a |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
designedexplosion
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| djswan wrote: | | designedexplosion wrote: | | <maybe who knows>we have multiple personalities, <maybe who knows> there is more then one of us, <maybe who knows> we are to smart for you, ,maybe who knows> we can outwit you, <maybe who knows> we are global conscience, |
Yepper, re.al si.ck.o pe.rverts. :cry:
Uga uga uga...
You got so..me real is..sue..s to de..al with dum...bass.
I think you should be issued you a citation. Where is Mr. Robo Cop now?
Momma said knock you out 8)
Mamma said go to bed baby. It is past your bedtime. :)
|
Unquote.
That was never said you si-ck.agoo..... and a mis.quote is a go.at.
The carpenter who thought he was king is now bending the rules in attempt to bend the steel of the railway of thought. Sweet dreams now. Just make sure you don't s.t you pnts now bby boy. :)
I hope your micro-cosmos of dreaming does not bring you the mares of night. Maybe the mares of our night era will demonstrate the errors of their micro-cosmos theories. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djswan
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 888
Location: Montana, USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not trying to bend the rules too much, I just can't think of a better way to describe you than "full of shit" It says so much in so few words.
get that wack job going for yourself, it will do you some good.
_________________
n/a |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
designedexplosion
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Uga uga, N.eand.erthal man has spoken again.
Blah abah, a uga a uga...
Sweet dreams now. Remember my advice.
And stop bending the rules while you are at it. If you bend them to far they might brake.
And then maybe your micro-cosmos will loose it's wheels.
:) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djswan
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 888
Location: Montana, USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I got a good night sleep, having a great morning and the verdict is....
Your still full of shit.
Uga uga says your full of shit too.
I'm teaching my kids that evil exist in lying religious perverts and the first sign of this is, shit, and if they are full of it. You sir, are full of shit. You smell bad, very bad.
Off to go fishing with my kids and teach them.
_________________
n/a |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
designedexplosion
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Structure of Infinity
W.estern, a.theistic c.osm.ology.
There is a Controller
At night the stars come out, and overhead are 100 billion stars in our g.alaxy. Beyond them are 1 trillion g.alaxies, each with 100 billion s.tars, planets and other flying balls. That is a total of 10^23 stars etc. There are many star clusters in the u..ni.verse. Each one is a circular ball composed of billions upon billions of s.tars, each with its own o.rbit. And in each ..s.tar-cluster there is a precisely balanced spinning and orbiting of planets and stars.
The usual shape of the g.alaxies is that of a saucer with a central sphere. Island u.niverses should not have their highly coordinated, inter-o.rbiting structure arrangement. The s.tars should all fly apart. Each g.alaxy is a carefully organized city in the sky.
Dark T.he.or.ies
In an attempt to explain this pattern, t.heorists declare that there must be "dark m.atter" pressing the g.alaxies together! But there is no evidence that such fanciful stuff exists. It takes a lot of imagination to hold the e.v.ol.u.ti.on.ary... t.h.e.ory.. together. T.heo.rists declare that "97% of the... u.niv.er.se... is missing." They are speaking of d.ark m.atter ("ex.otic matter") which they cannot find.
Why are g.ala.xies shaped like a disk? As.tronomers say there is no explanation for what could place s.tars into a g.alactic structural pattern. It surely is beautiful, with the globular clusters outside the disk, hanging in space like chandeliers, but how could random motions produce such balanced, artistic harmony?
Globular c.lusters are extremely stable, yet they ought to be the most unstable objects in the universe. The stars within g.lobular clusters should be crashing sometimes into one another. Most of it is empty space, so the chance of a collision is extremely small. The organization of s.tars within clusters is fabulous. Any non-thinking force capable of bringing these tens of thousands of stars into the globular cluster would have crushed them all together.
G.lobular clusters rotate separately, and even pass through the plane-without colliding with any stars! E.v.o.l.u.t.i.o.n... cannot explain this! These clusters are fantastic balls of s.tars, each one scattered above and below the g.alactic plane of island u.ni.verses. W.o.w!
How could all those s.tars get into a cluster, with absolutely nothing outside the cluster for many light-years? How could they all be there without crashing into one another or flying out from the cluster? Even super c.lusters have a definite o.rder and arrangement.
One or two giant, elliptical g.alax.ies are usually in the center of each cluster.
S.tars never get closer than a certain distance from one another (3.5 light-years apart). More than one half of all s.tars that we can individually examine through our tele.scopes are binary or multiple s.tar systems.
B.angs Only Create C.haos
It is said that after the B.i.g... B.a.n.g... there were ne.bulas, g.as-...c.louds. But how will ga.s get into s.tars and plan.ets? G.as can get into solids and solids transform into functioning structures or organized complexities like g.ala.x.ies, s.olar systems, f.lora and f.auna by g.uided forces or i.n.t.e.l.li.g.ent.... design.
G.amow, a well-known s.c.ie.nt.ist and s.c.i.e.n.ce... f.ic.tion writer originated the "B.i..g.. B..a..n.g" theory. S..c.i..e.n..ce.... f..i..c.t.io..n... is all it is.
Everything in M.aterial N.ature is Very P.recisely S.et-Up
If the n.uclear for.ce were only one part in a hundred stronger or weaker than it is now, car.bon could not exist, and car..bon is the basic element in every liv.ing.. thing. It would be impossible for ....e..v.o...l.ut..i.on... to produce the delicate balances of these f.o.r..ces. They were planned.
"It seems to be one of the fun.damental features of na.ture that .....fund..amental .....p..h.y..si.cal ....la..ws are described in terms of a m.athe..matical.. t..h.e.o..ry... of great beauty and power, needing quite a high standard of ...m..ath..ema.ti.cs.... for one to understand it… One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that ...G..o...d... is a..... m.at.he..m.at..ic.ian.... of a very ...h.ig..h... o.r.d..er, and H.e used very advanced m.ath.e..m..atics in constructing the universe".
The m.ass of the n.eu.tron must exceed that of the p.ro.ton in order for the stable elements to exist. But the neu.tr.on can only exceed the mass of the pro.t.on.. by an extremely small mount -- an amount that is exactly twice the m.a.s..s... of the e.le.ctron. That c.ritical.. point of balance is only one part in a thousand. If the ra.tio of the ma.ss of the.. pro.t.on.. to ne.u.tr..on.. were to vary outside of that limit, c.h.a.os.. would result. If it were any less or more, ....at.om.s..... would fly apart or crush together and everything would be destroyed. A ......M.a..s.t.er... Designer...... planned that the pro.ton's ma.s.s would be slightly smaller than that of the neu.t.ron. Otherwise the u.ni.verse would collapse.
Guided m-o.t.i.o.n.s
If the ..n.uc.le.ar... f.or.ce were only one p.art in a hundred str.onger or weak.er than it now is, ..car.bo.n.. could not exist, and ca.r.b..on.. is the basic ele.me.nt.. in every li.v.i.ng.. thing. It would be im.possible for ...e..v.o..l.u.t.i..on... to produce the delicate b.alances of these f.o.r.c..es. They were planned.
Why would m.a.tter that is ever e.x.pan.d.ing outward toward i.n.fi.n.ity.., suddenly stop and re.verse its direction? If all m.atter had finally moved into the outer p.er.imeter of the u..n.iv..e.rse, that is where the cen.ter of g.ravity would be.
Why would m.a.t.t.e.r.. want to reverse and move back away from the.... g.ra.vit.a.tio.nal.... field? The u.ni.ve.rse could not c.oll.apse.. inward unless there were ten times as much m.atter in the..... u.ni.ve.rse.... as there now is. This is the ...."m.is..sing..... ma.s.s" problem. E..v..o.lu.t.io.ni.s.t..s.. try to sol.ve it by .......t.h..e.o..ri.z..i.ng.. that 97% of the .....m.a.s..s.. in the u.n.i.v.e.r.se...... is "d.ar.k..... ma.t..ter" which cannot be located, seen, or identified with any .....s.c.ie.n.ti.fic.. instruments.
All the .....m.a.t..ter, shooting back inward, is supposed to ......co.lli.de.... in one ....mini.ature.... point. In reality, sp.eed would carry everything past that central stopping point.
There are no crashes in the turning and wh.irling of 10^23 stars, moons and planets.
If you read o.ffi.cial ....explan.ations, you will see a preoccupation with the D.EATH of ..s.tars and descriptions of COLL.IDING and MERG.ING and CANA.BALISING ....g.al..axies that are S.MASHING together. In what we are seeing most often is the .....b.irth ....of .....g.al.ax.ies.... and q.ua.sars..... not their ....d.eath.s. And, instead of ......c.o.lli.s.ion,..... the separation of parent and off.spring.
So, modern main.stream .......a.st.ro.nom.y....... is full of "illu.sions" and "mir.ages"(their explanation of why we should not believe our e.yes) and "strange and d.ark" e.nergy, m.atter, "n.eutron s..tars" and "bla.ck... ho.les", none of which have ever been seen or photographed but whose e.xist.ence they continually ....inv.oke in ......or.der to ......s.ave their otherwise fa.iled... t.h.e.o.r.ies.
One ....a.rgument of the ....."B.i.g... B..ange.rs".... is that the background .....r.a.d..i.ation..... in the ....u..n.i.verse..... is from the B..i...g... B...a...n...g,.... but the ....back.ground..... r.ad.iat.ion.... is omni-directional. Background... r..adiation comes from every direction instead of one. Background.... r...ad..iation" is actually a slight amount of ...h.e.at... given off by stars throughout the universe. Would they not be expected to .....e.mit.... a very faint a.mount of .....he.at.... into .....out.er..... spa.ce? Background... r.a..di..ation is too smooth. The.... t.he..ory.... requires that it be much more .....irre.gular..... and "lum.py" (with "den.sity..... fluc.tuations") in ...or.der.... for it to explain how ...s.tars could be formed from the ....B.i..g... B.a.n..g ...e.x.pl.os.ion.
Ang.ular... moment.um.... is another serious problem. Why do ....star.s... turn? Why do g.ala.xies rotate? Why do plan.ets... or.bit star..s? Why do bi.nary... star...s ...circle one another? How could the super-fast ...line.ar... (straight-line) .....m..ot..ion,..... started by the suppose.d... B..i...g.... B.a..n...g, have changed into r.otation (sp.inning or revol.ving ....m.o..t.i..on) and revol.utions (or.bi.ting ..m..otion)? How could an.gu.lar ...moment..um.... exist-and in such perfect.ly... balanced... or..bits throughout sp.ace? There is no possible way that floating g.as could transform itself into r.ot.ating and o.rb.iting objects, like s.ta..rs, plan..ets and moons.
Matter-or.igin.... the.or.ies cannot explain why star..s... spin. The the.oris.ts... tell us that sta.rs somehow started spinning; but, with age, they slow down. Yet some s.tars spin faster than either "younger" or "older" s.tars. Some spin once in less than an earth-d.ay. The fastest, Hz 1883, has a spin period of only 6 hours.
Some s..tars.. orb.it... backward to that of other stars. The theorists cannot explain this. S.aturn has 17 mo.ons, yet none of them ever collide with the rings. The farthest is Pho.ebe, which re.volves in a ....m.ot.i.on.... opposite to S.aturn and its rings. There are three co-or.bital m.oon sets; that is, each set shares the same o.rbit and chases its one or two companions around S.aturn endlessly. Some of the moo.ns travel clockwise, and others counterclockwise. How could all these mo..ons and their movements o.rig.in.ate by cha.nce? In fact, every m..o.on of the different plan..ets is located at the precise distance to keep it from fl.ying into or away from its plan..et. How could all this originate from a single e..xplo..sion or ..col.lisi.on? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
designedexplosion
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dj wrote: | I g.ot a ..g..ood ni..ght sl.e.ep.., h.avi.n.g ..a.. gr.eat... m.or.n.ing and the v.er..dict is....
(Fa.ke ..v.e..rdicts)
Yo.ur s.till fu.ll.. of ..sh..it. :D
(They woke up even more fu.ll of it).
Uga uga says your f.u.ll ....of s..hit ...to..o.
(Ne.and.erthal ..m.an... says... these ...gu.ys... have gone bizu.rka.)
I'm.. te.a.ching ...m.y.... ki.ds.... th.at ...e.v.il ....exi.st ...in.. ly.ing re.lig.ious... p.erver.ts ..and the firs.t ..si.gn of this is, sh..it, and if they are fu.ll of it. .. Yo.u... s.ir,.. are f.ul.l ..of ..s.hit. You ..s.m.ell... b.a.d, very ba.d.
Off... to ...go ..fish.ing... with ...my ..ki..ds.. and... t..each.... them.
(Ya, ...be..fore... you ...ind.octr..inate... y.our ...ki.ds.., tr.y ...ma.king... s.ome.. logi.cal ..sen.se... first, rather they ..your ..uga buga.. N.ea.nd.erthal ....thi.nki.ng.) |
.
Notice how people as this guy never read the e.vidence being presented, (The E.vidence That D.emands a V.erdict) but rather, close their ears and minds and keep sho.uting the same things, that others are in.s.ane, and then proceed to ind.octr.inate their ch.ild.ren into learning how anyone challenging ......e..v.olu.ti..on....(or this fake system of bending rules here) has to be c.ra.zy, and are ...."r.e.l.i.g.io.us .....perverts". This sounds exactly like the .....a.c.c.us.ations of ...ex-t.y.r.a.n.n..ical........ g.o..ve.r.nm..e.nts...... of the past, who attempted to ......b.a.n.i..sh ......any ideas that did not agree to the ......s.y..st.e..m. ---- R.o.m..e.... ended up succumbing and even declared a......... r.e.l.i.g.i.o.n.... to be the ...r.e.l.i.g..i.o.n.. of the ....S..t.a..t.e. Today we seek for this .......s.e.p..ar.ation,... but some still understand that .....s..c.i.e..nc.e ...and S..t.at..e ....must mix, or that teaching and ....s..c.i.e.n.c..e.... should support the same .....h.e.r..e.s.ies... of ...beliefs of these a.n.ti-.G.o..d... systems, while ....r.e..l.i.g.i..o.n.... or altern.ate views of ...s..c.i.e..n.c..e...., that altough are able to pr.o.v.e.... ...e..v..o.l..u..t..i.o..n.... is f.u..ll.... of .....e.r.r..o.r,..... ,,that such members of society should be .....e.x-c.o.mm...un.i.c.at.e.d....(As they are ........a.t.t..e.m.pt.ing........ to do here).. S.ad to see there will be a day when those who hold ....v.i.e.ws.... contrary to the .S..t.a.t.e... will be........... m..u.r..d..e.r..e.d,..... e.x..e.c..u.t.ed........ and ...m..a.r..te.r..ed .....for their anti-system views. This day is quickly coming upon us, and a ....d.r.e.ad.ful.... day it is becoming for .....li.be.rty.... and freedom. The .....t.r.u.th.... is not for the ...f.a.i.n.t... or ...w.e.a.k... of ...h.eart, but for the..... c.o.u.r.a..ge.ous.... and strong, for those willing to ...s.t.a.nd... up against the ....s..y.s..t.e.m...., even if it means ....fac..i.n.g.... d.e.a.t.h...., in ...o..r.d.er.... to uphold d.i.g.n.i.ty....., h.o.nor... and .....f.r...e.e..d.o..m. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
blogger
del.icio.us
digg
slashdot
